You might expect churches and religious schools, of all places, to remain safe from the government’s meddling hands.
Our Constitution does guarantee religious freedom, after all.
But if the “Equality Act” is passed, not even churches and religious schools will be safe from the government’s reach.
The deceptively named Equality Act was introduced in both houses of Congress in March and passed by the House of Representatives in May. It would add “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” as protected classes to existing laws banning discrimination in places of public accommodation, employment, housing, and by recipients of federal financial assistance.
The “Equality Act” poses devastating and unprecedented threats to religious freedom.
We’ve already seen examples of these threats where similar legislation has been passed at the state and local levels. Now, let’s take a look at what the “Equality Act” would mean for churches and religious schools.
In Massachusetts, state officials declared that churches are subject to state public accommodation laws. That meant if churches host public activities – something as simple as a spaghetti supper – they would be forced to open women’s private changing areas and restrooms to biological men. If a church refused, it would face crippling fines and even jail time.
This impacted people like Pastor Esteban Carrasco and House of Destiny Ministries. Esteban and his church were seeking to open a women’s shelter for survivors of domestic violence. But according to this interpretation of the law, they would be forced to allow men who identify as female to use the same changing rooms, restrooms, and living facilities as these vulnerable women.
Thankfully, in response to an ADF lawsuit, state officials reversed course and admitted that the First Amendment protects a church’s freedom to operate consistently with its faith even when it hosts community outreach events.
But situations like this will multiply if the “Equality Act” is imposed on the whole country.
In South Euclid, Ohio, city officials passed a city ordinance that adds religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression as protected classes under the law.
This deeply concerned The Lyceum, a classical, Catholic school, so it spoke out against the ordinance from the very beginning. Still, the city voted to pass it.
The Lyceum operates according to the teachings of the Catholic Church, including its beliefs on human sexuality and marriage – and it asks its employees to do the same. It also asks its students and their parents to abide by the teachings of the Catholic Church while the student attends The Lyceum, regardless of whether they are Catholic.
The Lyceum was concerned that the law could force it to employ people whose actions conflict with the school’s beliefs. The Lyceum reached out to the city multiple times to find out if it would face substantial fines and even jail time for its administration if it operates according to its religious beliefs. But the city refused to say.
That’s why ADF filed a lawsuit on behalf of The Lyceum.
Thankfully, in response to the lawsuit, the city admitted that The Lyceum has the right to hire employees that share its beliefs. But the school would likely not have that same freedom if the “Equality Act” becomes the law of the land.
The “Equality Act” also threatens religious colleges and universities, forbidding college students from using their federal tuition assistance at schools that “discriminate” on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. That means any Christian university that has a code of conduct prohibiting homosexual behavior or that declines to let biological males compete on women’s sports teams will lose federal student aid.
While you might expect churches and Christian schools to be safe from such government overreach, experience tells us that this will not be the case if the “Equality Act” is made law.
It seems the Biden administration is demanding conformity to its ideological agenda at all costs. And when it comes to its radical plan to change the meaning of “sex” in federal law, it's female athletes who will pay a heavy toll.Continue reading